Does Preparation H Still Work To Loose Inches

Obstacles to success Benchmarking Benchmarking Partners

Like any other activity, it may not give the Benchmarking good results. This section highlights some of the obstacles most frequently Benchmarking the success of a company.

Approach to itself
Benchmarking To produce the desired results, you should know someone on the outside have a much better process. If a company is regarded itself only, it is not uncommon, it may not be aware that its processes are much less efficient than the best of its kind . A restricted focus inward vision. Is there someone better?
Who is it? Such companies do not even question themselves, which often lead to serious health risks .

too broad objective Benchmarking
Un objetivo de Benchmarking excesivamente amplio tal como “mejorar los resultados” puede garantizar el fracaso. Ésta puede ser la razón para hacer el Benchmarking, pero se necesitará algo más específico y orientado no al qué sino al cómo. Hace falta un objetivo más concreto como “Mejorar o sustituir el proceso de facturación para reducir los errores en un 50%”. Esto aporta algo sobre lo que se puede trabajar.
Plazos irreales
El Benchmarking es un proceso complicado que no puede comprimirse en unas cuantas semanas. Consider four to six months shorter program for an experienced team, and six to eight as a general rule.

Trying to do so in less time than that will force the team to go through high certain details that may lead to failure. If you want to take advantage of Benchmarking , be patient. Moreover, any project that exceeds one year to review: there are probably unanticipated difficulties. Poor
team composition
When a process is subject to Benchmarking, the people who knows and uses it every day must be involved in it. These people can be operators or employees. You can incorporate other professionals, but without excluding those most knowledgeable about how the process really works, who will be the fastest detect the often subtle differences between the process and benchmarking partner.
Comply with a level below the best

Too often organizations choose partners that Benchmarking is not the best of its kind. There are three reasons for this:

• Best is not interested in participating.
• wrong partner was identified.
• The company simply chose a partner in a company that was available.

Companies Benchmarking start when they decide that one or more of its processes is much lower than the best of its kind. The intention is to examine this best in class process and adapt to their needs, quickly bringing the company higher levels existing in this field. It makes no sense to have a link with a partner whose process is only good, even better than own. Companies must identify the best and go after him. Only if the best is not involved, is justified choose the latter. Attention
unfocused
A common cause of failure in the Benchmarking is that teams are bogged down endless collecting data and putting too much emphasis on numbers . Both the collection of data as the numbers themselves are important, but the most important aspect is the process itself. They take the enough data to understand the process on paper, and analyze data so we are confident that the results can significantly improve if the process is implemented. It has to keep the focus on the process, taking the data and the numbers support.
Lack of sensitivity towards partners
faster Nothing broken an agreement to carry out the Benchmarking insensitivity. Do not forget that a partner is doing a favor to the company by providing access to their process. It has people's valuable time Benchmarking key partner, and in the best case, is being interrupted daily work routine. If you do not pay sufficient attention to the method agreed with the partner, it is likely that the process stagnates.
Limited support from senior management
This aspect is still under discussion because it is critical to success in all stages Benchmarking activity. It requires constant support address to start the process, develop actions, and ultimately ensure outcomes.

Conclusions

Businesses today are faced with global markets challenges they face getting bigger. One of them is the competitiveness, and that face not only local companies, but the competition is between companies around the world. To be increasingly competitive business use different tools to cut costs, increase quality of its products, etc. Among these tools, or formulas is Benchmarking.
Benchmarking can be defined by the strategy that identifies the
best business practices among companies recognized as leaders who to adapt and implement in our company, can not only match the direct competition, but give us a competitive advantage.
can also be concluded that due to the different approaches or methodologies applied in benchmarking studies, the company interested in doing a study of this type will have to select the process best suited to resources and needs.
In general we can conclude that the benchmarking study, if done as an ongoing process are standardized, will serve as a tool for innovation to improve business results by enabling the identification of best business practices among the leaders, so that more competitive and we can have greater assurance of success in a changing environment as current.